Wednesday, 4 November 2020

Election Results

 I think I must have wasted a full 24 hours on watching the election results coming in. Some thoughts:

  1. This was way closer than what was predicted by the so-called experts. It's cute when people claim their predictions were not THAT wrong because the candidate did finally win. Or that the error margin is the same as in previous elections. The bottomline is their estimates were incorrect.
  2. It is a relief to see how the final picture is setting up. I had picked Joe as the most likely candidate to win both the primaries and the election. I had to fight many close friends who were at times frustrated and angry to see me backing "a less progressive candidate." My choice was based on my understanding of the preferences of the country and who I thought was mostly likely to prevail. It feels gratifying to get texts from the same friends who concede I had a point. 
  3. The political impasse will continue. It seems Joe over performed considering the balance of votes in Congress. This is important. There was no roll-over but people still felt they had to make a distinction at the top of the ballot even while voting conservative down-ballot.
I need to get back to work now! A day was lost.

Saturday, 31 October 2020

Mrs. Dalloway, Again

Fifth year of an economics PhD is all about rhythm. You're supposed to be in the groove and on your way. Discipline, focus, and a self-reinforcing web of commitments.

Which is to say you shouldn't be surprised if I tell you my insomnia has grown in stature and I am a pebble away from collapsing under my own weight.

So what does one do at 2.46 am on a Wednesday with a once in a century pandemic on the loose along with a generation-defining election in a week?

A Review of Mrs. Dalloway

I have mentioned before that my favorite Virginia Woolf novel is To the Lighthouse. Indeed, that book touched me in a way no other work by Woolf has done, and though my opinion hasn't changed after reading Mrs. Dalloway again, I have a lot to say.

This time's sojourn in the London of 1923 began on a train ride to Southampton. I needed something to distract me from the worries of traveling in the midst of covid. And so I decided to get into a different stream of thought. A stream of consciousness, if you will.

Virginia Woolf's books have some common traits. They are all demanding reads: your concentration cannot drop or waver. Woolf is constantly moving across several characters' heads; she's switching the subject of the sentence deftly; and she's doing it all beautifully. Missing a beat doesn't only mean losing the flow. A distracted read probably means you would end up not liking the book, at a minimum.

The cold stream of visual impressions failed him now as if the eye were a cup that overflowed and let the rest run down its china wall unrecorded. The brain must wake now. The body must contract now, entering the house, the lighted house, where the door stood open, where the motor cars were standing, and bright women descending: the soul must brave itself to endure. He opened the big blade of his pocket knife.

Second, Woolf's books carry an undercurrent. Even if it is a scene of tranquility that she is painting, there is, right there, subtly, just underneath the surface, a whirlpool of anxiety and anger. It recalls Louise Glück's commentary on John Berryman, "The background is the abyss; the poems venture as close to the edge as possible." Virginia Woolf's darkness spills out through her characters, as with other writers, but it also seeps through her prose.

The secret signal which one generation passes, under disguise, to the next is loathing, hatred, despair. Dante the same. Aeschylus (translated) the same.

Third, her books are emotionally heavy. Virginia Woolf did not have a happy life. She was introspective and incisive with her assessment of the world and its many flawed characters. Her books can easily put you into depression. They are not for the faint of heart. Mrs. Dalloway is still a more sprightly read, unlike To the Lighthouse, but the abyss of despondency is a step away, all the same.

...with hazel eyes which had that look of apprehension in them which makes complete strangers apprehensive too.

And, finally, her books are extraordinarily perceptive. 

She felt very young; at the same time unspeakably aged. She sliced like a knife through everything; at the same time was outside, looking on.

The story covers a day in London and flits across the lives of several protagonists, chief among them being Clarissa Dalloway and Septimus Warren Smith. It's really just a single solitary day. The characters, however, are not merely living out the present -- they cannot -- for they cannot escape how their lives are inextricably connected to their past and how they are living out the consequences of decisions made many many years before. It's one of the themes of the book: the weight of past decisions lingers and its consequences cast a shadow decades removed. 

The notion of Time is not only connected to the past. Clarissa and Septimus both understand the fragility of their existence. Its finiteness and their sheer mortality troubles them. In To the Lighthouse (TTL) too there are questions about what a person leaves behind when they are no longer alive. But while this vexed question is left as the backdrop in TTL, in Mrs. Dalloway the characters actively consider their own mortality. 

Clarissa worries about the futility of her life. She finds it difficult to accept that her place in the world is transitory. She hopes the echoes of her existence reverberate in other people's lives. She wonders if the very wind and the leaves and everything else gets suffused by the momentary presence of ephemeral individuals. Septimus, in his fits of madness, feels he has obtained immortal knowledge which the wretched world cannot comprehend. He sees through it all. But the burden of knowing is crushing him, his mortal self. 

Time even makes its corporeal presence felt through the booming leaden circles cast by Big Ben. The striking of the tower is interspersed through the pages as it faithfully marks the passage of the day but also serves a constant reminder to all about the inexorable passage of time.

Big Ben was beginning to strike, first the warning, musical; then hour, irrevocable.

Yet it is not the role of Time that affected me while reading the book. It was its discussion of mental illness. Septimus Warren Smith is a veteran. He lost his closest friend in the battlefield. The trauma of the loss ensconces his soul slowly. It grows like a parasite. It affects his ability to communicate with his wife, Rezia, who he courted while billeted in Italy, who grew up in a convivial atmosphere of a family hat-making business, and who is now tormented by her husband's madness and terrified by his suicidal tendencies.

Even more troubling is the relationship Septimus has with his doctors. We begin with Dr. Holmes, a man completely out of his depth. Holmes thinks Septimus has no affliction. He gives an ignoramus' assurance. He lets Septimus' neurosis grow unabated.  It grows to the point when Rezia finally approaches the considerably more famous and expensive Sir William Bradshaw.

Woolf's dissection of Bradshaw is extraordinary and unnerving. It was possibly informed by her own experience with psychiatrists and psychologists -- Woolf suffered several nervous breakdowns throughout her life. There is a public facet of Bradshaw. He is kind, impressive, and an adherent of "Proportion." Proportion being the principle that the secret to a good life of health and success is keeping life's elements in check. Having the right balance. Superficially, his proposed treatment for Septimus is merely so: sending him to a house in the countryside where he is monitored and allowed to recover, away from Rezia.

But Rezia senses a sinister counterpart to Proportion. She calls it "Conversion," the tendency for those who live life in Proportion to force deviants into shape, to whip them without remorse; dehumanizing their worries as mere pathologies. In other words, Conversion seeks to conquer. Rezia fears for Septimus. She sees the ruthless cruelty in Bradshaw's methods. Cruelty, not of the physical kind, but something far worse. She is powerless. 

That is the most disturbing part of the novel. What is mental health? How do we understand it? How do we treat it? And what terrors does the patient suffer that are inaccessible to a closed well-educated well-polished professional? Rezia did a far better job of keeping Septimus sane than any doctor did. I do not think this is coincidence.

When I read Virginia Woolf there is always one character that seems to speak Woolf's mind most clearly. In TTL, it is Lily Briscoe. In Mrs. Dalloway, it is Septimus. Septimus is asking for help. Help is nowhere to be found.

The day ends. Clarissa organizes a party where prominent names pay visit. She also meets old friends who have influenced her life indelibly and about whom she cannot stop reminiscing on most days. But she has no time for them. The Prime Minister is here. And so is Sir William Bradshaw and a dozen other dignitaries.

In a novel about one's exhausting battles with inner demons; still having to make sense of life in the physical world; living in the shadow of a disorienting First World War, all in an exquisite, if demanding, stream of consciousness writing style, one hopes to find meaning in futility. And to answer the following question:
"What does the brain matter," said Lady Rosseter, getting up, "compared with the heart?"

Sunday, 18 October 2020

Quote of the Week - VII



O mortal men,
Arise! And, casting off your earthly cares,
Learn ye the potency of heaven-born mind,
Its thought and life far from the herd withdrawn!

~ Edmund Halley, in the preface to Newton's Principia

(Previous post in the series.) 

 


Friday, 28 August 2020

A New Decade

I turned 30 this month.

I have a reliable test when it comes to judging what I've done in life. I always hark back to the time when I was 14 or 15. I imagine myself -- indomitable, unconquerable, uncompromising. And I ask myself if that young adult would've approved of whatever I have achieved today.

It would not be incorrect or harsh to say he would be sorely disappointed. In the three decades I have spent on this planet, I have ended up wasting most of my time in the last one. I have burnt myself over ambitions that deserved no attention; I gave my soul to these endeavors. I paid a heavy price.

It is disconcerting to know I am now supposed to be an adult. It is distressing to imagine the roads that are closed off to me, most temporarily but some permanently, simply because I made some fundamental mistakes.

So what's next? A painful retreat or a glorious charge into the melee once more?

You know what I am thinking.



Sunday, 16 August 2020

Suite Française

When Irène Némirovsky started writing Suite Française, she envisioned the novel to have five parts – a massive tome that would promise to be her finest achievement; her tour de force.

Irène was a famous writer of her times already. But she was also a Jew. And so, in 1942, she was arrested and deported to Auschwitz. She died a month later.

Before this unthinkably tragic end, Irène could only write the first two parts of her novel. Her manuscript should’ve been lost but it miraculously survived, preserved by her daughter as she successfully fled the Nazis. It still took sixty-four years for the manuscript to finally see the light of public attention. As possibly the first novel to be written about World War II, and because of the way it was written – in Irène’s journal compressed into 140 pages written in a tiny font while she was hiding in the countryside somewhere in Central France – it has since been widely acclaimed and was recently made into a movie by the same name, in 2014. (The movie is good but doesn’t really cover the intricacies of the novel.)

The copy of Suite Française that you can get now contains the first two parts – Storm in June and Dolce – as well as an appendix that contains Irène’s notes. These notes are morbidly fascinating, dealing with both the novel and her initial exasperation followed by leaden dread at what was to come.

The book was intended to be a story of a few individuals and their families in France in the time of World War II as they experienced the incursion and invasion of the German troops, followed by occupation, and was to chronicle their struggles as they sought to hold on to their lives, their livelihoods, and dignity.

Suite Française is an incredibly humane and compassionate story of France in the midst of invasion. It also challenges the reader’s conception of the individuals who comprised the conquered and, to a limited extent, the conquerors.

(Despite the author’s own turmoil, it elides any mention of the Jews – I think I could count only one or two instances where she even mentions the word.)

A short summary would be thus: it is a compelling book about inequality and collaboration dealing with the turmoil of emotions in the minds of the conquered as they find a way to survive, some choosing to compromise, others torturing themselves through hope, and yet others simply forgetting their circumstances. There are no modern twists and turns and yet the book is gripping in its own way.

Below, I present a synopsis of the novel. I keep it separate because I know of people who prefer not to know anything about the plot, and I respect that.

************

The first part, Storm in June, describes in vivid detail the Exodus of Parisians from their beloved city as the German army reached their doorsteps. In the midst of air raids and chaos, we follow a set of individuals from different classes and professions as they prepare to leave.

We follow a prominent family, the Péricands; a famous writer and his partner; a working class couple; a collector of antiques; and a few other well fleshed out characters, as they deal with panic and desperation when fleeing from one place to the other. Their lives occasionally intersect in the madness. Even in this dog-eat-dog world we see moments of collaboration and cooperation. Kindness shows up in the unlikeliest of places.

Némirovsky’s prose is unsparing as she provides a searing indictment of class inequities. This anger spills out on occasion,

"But why are we always the ones who have to suffer?” she cried out in indignation. “Us and people like us? Ordinary people, the lower middle classes. If war is declared or the franc devalues, if there’s unemployment or a revolution, or any sort of crisis, the others manage to get through all right. We’re always the ones who are trampled! Why? What did we do? We’re paying for everybody else’s mistakes. Of course they’re not afraid of us. The workers fight back, the rich are powerful. We’re just sheep to the slaughter. I want to know why? What’s happening? I don’t understand. You’re a man, you should understand,” she said angrily to Maurice, no longer knowing whom to blame for the disaster they were facing. “Who’s wrong? Who’s right? Why Corbin? Why Jean-Marie? Why us?”

Ultimately their escape is futile – the Germans are victorious and take over large parts of France. Storm in June ends here and we segue to occupation, which forms the second part of the novel, Dolce.

If the first part was urban in its scope and concerns, Dolce is all about pastoral life. We shift to a village far removed from the cities. Némirovsky herself was situated in a village when she fled Paris and one wonders how much of the content derives from her experience there.

With German occupation, invading troops were billeted with local families. This meant the presence of a German soldier living in a house with no men, for most French men were prisoners of war or killed in battle. The uncomfortableness of this situation is clear – the women of the household had to tolerate the presence of a person whose country was responsible for incarcerating or killing their husbands and sons. The Germans were their overlords, and the women were helpless. How they reacted and dealt with this intrusive occupation is an important theme of the book.

But what strikes the reader is Irène’s ability to get into the minds of the conquerors. Némirovsky’s lens is one of incredible humanity. She manages to make the occupants somewhat human and allows the reader to imagine their thoughts. This is remarkable. We follow, in particular, the strained relationship between Lucile Angellier and Bruno von Falk, the former being the daughter-in-law of a prominent land-owner in the village, the latter an officer, a Nazi.

It’s a truism that people are complicated, multifaceted, contradictory, surprising, but it takes the advent of war or other momentous events to be able to see it. It is the most fascinating and the most dreadful of spectacles, she continued thinking, the most dreadful because it’s so real; you can never pride yourself on truly knowing the sea unless you’ve seen it both calm and in a storm. Only the person who has observed men and women at times like this, she thought, can be said to know them. And to know themselves.

The book raises uncomfortable questions about the compromises individuals made to survive. Even here, the privileges that the aristocrats have over the farmers and working classes are glaring.

In the end, one cannot help but feel a great deal of regret in not seeing this novel attain completion. The story ends on an exciting turn and sets up what would have been the intertwining of the urban and the pastoral. We can only wonder at what could’ve been.

Sunday, 26 July 2020

Word Ruminations

One of the many delightful quirks of the Harry Potter series is the naming scheme JK Rowling bestows on her characters. The Black family, for example, are mostly named after stars in different constellations such as the Orion, Canis Major and Leo -- everyone knows that.

Bellatrix is my favorite name from the set, unfortunately given to a vile and evil character. The name comes from the female version of the Latin word for 'warrior.' 

And then, somehow, even though the words are very different in meaning, my mind jumps to the word 'belletrist,' which, according to Oxford Languages, means
a person who writes essays, particularly on literary and artistic criticism, that are composed and read primarily for their aesthetic effect.
Both are pretty words. 

EDIT: An earlier version of the blog suggested -- somewhat embarrassingly given my claim "everyone knows that" -- that all of the Black family members are named after stars in different constellations. My friend and immortal quiz partner, Abhinav Malhotra, pointed out that Narcissa Malfoy is not named after anything in the night sky. Some more research brought out another example in Lycoris Black. Both Narcissa and Lycoris are named after plants. Thanks bhai.

Monday, 20 July 2020

Clarke's Three Laws

In the huge universe of inspirational quotes, books, and movies, Clarke's Three Laws burn bright like an O-type star.

Briefly, they are:
  1. When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.
  2. The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible.
  3. Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
The third one has received a lot of attention and fame but I find the first two to be more instructive. And inspiring. 

[From October 24, 2018]

Middlemarch

A book review written a year after the book was read is not a review per se. I cannot bank on a spontaneous rush of thoughts. I no longer ha...