(A follow-up to the post Fiscal Crisis)
Let's talk about the mathematics of the situation. If you read my last post, you would find an estimate of some 150 newspapers piled up in a neglected and inconspicuous corner of my office. It seemed a decent guess back then.
With an inflated assumption of 180 I guessed the entire series could be wrapped up with 12 a day (I get 4 newspapers daily). Elementary maths. And so it began. I was diligent in completing my daily target.
There was just this small problem. The pile wasn't coming down.
I increased my paper intake. I raised the bar to 20. I toiled for a fortnight with the revised strategy. My challenge soon unfolded, the denouement a sinister joke around my infantile obsession. A series of revised estimates told me a depressing and demoralizing fact.
There were 800 newspapers in there.
It seemed a worthless struggle. I could have done better with that time. But deep reluctance in throwing away all that knowledge to the kabaadi was too much to bear - I held on.
After the tenth day something remarkable happened. On a pure whim, I upped my intake to 30 a day. And a few days after I completed 50. Something clicked. I was on fire.
My personal highest?
One Hundred Sixty Seven. In a Day.
Yeah. I did it.
What was the reason for you reading so many newspapers and how much time you devoted to it?
ReplyDeleteI have always read 4-5 newspapers daily for 15+ years now. Lots of issues in the plant (I was looking after) meant too much work leading to this state of toxic inactivity on the reading front.
DeleteI think I devoted about 1-2 hours on this everyday. Generally around lunch time and then before leaving for home in the evening.